You don't deny you are an investor in Citrea that started all this shit and the claim about returns are pure BS.
You support the change that when done on BSV resulted in CSAM.
You support the shitcoiners that damage Bitcoin even at the moment with their spam.
Bad actor.
this narrative is not correct. lifting the placebo filter doesn't allow large OP_RETURNs to suddenly start happening. we are not sitting around anxiously waiting for core to push the big evil button, after which it will be possible for the first time. it already happened.
the largest OP_RETURN on bitcoin happened 298 days ago and it was 79,870 bytes, which is over 7 times bigger than your profile picture. it appears to have been submitted to slipstream, meaning someone told it directly to a miner and bypassed the mempool completely. the filter didn't work. it looks like it was a runestone, so it's probably a picture. if you don't have pruning enabled, it's on your computer right now.
and you seem totally lost about what citrea even does. its sequencer posts zero knowledge proofs onto bitcoin of transactions that happened on a separate blockchain. it does not post the transactions themselves. this is a GOOD thing if you don't want people doing ethereum-type stuff directly inside the bitcoin blockchain.
Now check the percentage of all OP_RETURNs that are less than 83 Bytes and the ones with more.
I don't think that's true either. I don't agree with your root cause analysis or your bogeyman selection. it became normalized to tell transactions directly to miners when blocks first started being full. this is what opened up the can of worms with nonstandard-but-valid transactions becoming more common than they were before. if you still want to blame core for something, you can blame them for this.
sorry, you're wrong again. mara slipstream is currently in operation and can be accessed here:
here is an example of a nonstandard transaction that they included recently. it was never in the mempool.
https://mempool.space/tx/22d920c4ef593fb107857be1991e5ee42ec4b2210a53f3721a138732999ec7a8
The haven't stopped their Slipstream.
They have stopped accepting transactions with sub 1 sat per vB fees because of the nodes policies ...
and these node policies deter slipstream from including some types of nonstandardness but not others because?
deter mass abuse
I mean if I ran this kind of thing I'd want extra on top of the going rate just because it's custom and costs extra to operate
Cheer a little bit, its funny I promise 😂😂🤣
