I’m not sure if my observation is fully accurate because my sample size isn’t large enough. I have observed myself and some people whom I consider to be very smart (since these very smart people are those I subjectively perceive as such, based on my limited observations, so I can’t fully confirm whether they are indeed very smart. However, they do have quite impressive achievements). It seems that very smart people often have ideas that are different from the norm. (Because, from my childhood until now, I’ve had many imaginative and unconventional ideas.) I conclude that I am very smart based on the following four points:

1. I have observed and compared people around me extensively.

2. I have achieved many things from my teenage years to the present that most people might never accomplish in their entire lives.

3. I ask AI for big data analysis to compare myself with others.

4. I compare myself with AI and see whose perspective on the same matter is more comprehensive, and the result is that I am more comprehensive than AI.

For example, there’s a very famous lawyer and debate competition participant in the Chinese online world named “Zhan Qingyun.” She talks about how, when she was a child, she had some thoughts that were different from the norm. When her teacher told her that 1 is smaller than 2, 2 is smaller than 3, and 3 is smaller than 4, the teacher assigned homework to write the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7 as practice, and she wrote them in a way shown in the image below. I don’t know how others think, but I personally find it very imaginative and creative.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.