IMO it needs to stay that way. Pay to read is a non-starter, there are too many relays and your follows could be anywhere. Writers have to pay, it's just the way it is. I wonder what the numbers would be if you did total cash outflows divided by total number of writes. How many sats per write (or hopefully, writes per sat) would you need to turn a profit?
Discussion
Why does one pay a relay at all? For read filtering and targeted feeds á la filter.nostr.wine. IMHO it should be a subscription by time.
You pay so that others will not automatically assume your content is spam. Reading from a paid relay means you are confident that there is very little spam in the feed. Creators pay for that discoverability.
You can stick to 100% free use, but majority of users will filter you as spam unless they are your follower (or maybe your follower's follower).
Also #[7] I had another idea that maybe you guys should look into. Eventually we will need a YouTube replacement. That means servers that can receive, compress, and stream video for nostr clients. There are potentially a number of different models:
- Pay per video uploaded
- Pay per MB of video uploaded
- In the nostr spirit of flipping revenue models on their head, uploaders do revenue share with hosts by paying *per view*. e.g., you upload a video and buy 1000 views for X sats. When consumed, buy another 1000. This would work if content creators made money in the usual ways (ads, product placements, Livestream tips, etc). Since they keep 100% of that revenue (as opposed to Google taking 50% off the top), they pay for what resources they consume via their audience. (Of course anyone could pay, but it would make sense to allow and encourage creators to pay so that their audience can view for free.)