TL;DR: I agree and disagree with both, and I realise noone knows much about what's happening so it's futile discussion, but very happy we are having it.

Fundamentally:

1. hat the original nostr is to be taken to the scrutiny as satoshis paper. Evolution is necessary and we all get to vote with our software and ideas every day. New projects come, government attack it, the swage rat survives, learns and becomes stronger.

2. I don't think that opposing my first point makes anyone a SVB. Conservation is a good principle to keep and ossification may help in the long run.

3. Fuck knows what nostr is going to be or even if it's got major flaws that lead to it's destruction tomorrow. What matters is that these ideas can now be freely discussed, disagreed and there are no special consequences for anyone or for Nostr as a protocol.

4. I just love the freedom to be able to say this, not be mobbed by a crowd, *because* there's more here we have in common than what separates us.