I’m saying in general. Now we gotta do the CTV soft fork to make lightning scalable
Discussion
what's that?
Now as in today, or as in we see if we can build consensus about adding it in the near to mid future?
Maybe some better ideas will be in the future idk. But messing around and flooding bitcoin with soft forks doesn’t worth it. Just my 5 cents
In general, I agree. However, I would hardly call 1 potential soft fork every few years "flooding." Most folks seem to agree that Bitcoin needs some form of covenants at some point, though. Moreover, nothing requires us to settle on which of the proposed options we want to try and activate any time soon, but we absolutely SHOULD talk about all of the options well in advance - their pros and cons, those with the expertise to review the code, etc.
That being the case, I would hardly call the covenants discussion "flooding" Bitcoin with soft forks. We've had Taproot all the way back in 2021 and now we are in the process of discussing maybe adding covenants sometime in the future.