I didn't use the word "revolution" at any point in my comment or misspell anything and I'm not sure what you're confused about here. Maybe you're confusing democracy with revolution, as they're two closely related concepts.
Discussion
It was a joke... Democracy by bullet isn't democracy, it's revolution.
Incorrect. Revolution is under the umbrella of democracy. Not sure what you're basing your statements on here
There is no democracy without order, there is no order in revolution.
Still incorrect and still not sure what you're basing this stuff on. You can't have a group of humans without democracy unless one of them is much bigger than the others or something
You could call that democratic, but the people have much less of a real choice. So it's useless democracy. Really there is no liberty without order.
Maybe there is no survival without order and no liberty without survival but in the mean time...
No... Humanity survives in temporary chaos. It's just not pleasent or a world that anyone desires. There will be order, just a matter of who establishes it. Then you get "democracies" like China and Russia.