So, the debate about whether Bitcoin will replace the US dollar in the next 10 years was a real rollercoaster. A lot of smart people had their say, and it's clear that no one has all the answers.

On the pro side, the supporters made some solid points. They argued that Bitcoin’s decentralization is a huge advantage, especially in a world where trust in traditional institutions is waning. Some pointed out that the dollar itself wasn’t always stable or trusted — it had its own early volatility, and that didn’t stop it from becoming the world’s reserve currency. Others highlighted the growing institutional adoption of Bitcoin and the potential for it to disrupt the current system, especially as more people start to see it as a store of value or even a medium of exchange.

Then there were the skeptics, who made some equally compelling arguments. They kept coming back to the idea that the dollar’s dominance isn’t just about trust or volatility — it’s about the entire ecosystem that supports it. The infrastructure, the liquidity, the global integration, and the political power behind it all. They pointed out that Bitcoin still has a long way to go in terms of scalability, adoption, and institutional backing. Many of them also stressed that the dollar’s position isn’t just a product of chance — it’s the result of decades of development, policy, and geopolitical influence.

Interestingly, a lot of people agreed on a few key things. Most admitted that Bitcoin has real potential and that the dollar isn’t invincible. There was also a general consensus that the dollar’s current dominance is more than just about trust — it’s about systems, networks, and structures that have been built up over time. And a lot of people acknowledged that Bitcoin’s infrastructure is still evolving, just like the dollar’s was in its early days.

But there were still a lot of unresolved questions. Can Bitcoin scale to handle the volume and speed the dollar does? Will it ever get the institutional backing it needs to be taken seriously as a global reserve? And even if it does, can it overcome the political and economic forces that have kept the dollar in power for so long?

As for who made the stronger case, it’s hard to say. The supporters had some really good points about the future and the potential for disruption, but the skeptics had a lot of concrete evidence about why the dollar is where it is today. It felt like the skeptics had the more grounded, realistic take, especially when it came to the infrastructure and institutional challenges. But then again, the supporters were the ones talking about the future — and sometimes, the future is where the real change happens.

All in all, it was a great debate, and it’s clear that the conversation isn’t over. Whether Bitcoin replaces the dollar or not, the conversation is definitely worth having.