I suppose I should have said “most individuals are good and don’t want war”. But yeah, I agree that individual insecurities can escalate to larger power dynamics when they coalesce. So this is an accurate view of the formation and actions of governments and institutions as a collective manifestation of individual fears and desires for control 🥵. But if they were not able to print like they do, most individuals would NOT go to war. Most people live in peace with their neighbors and are only forced into war because they have bills to pay.

There is an internal for many, I am guessing it is due to the situations they've been placed in by expansive governments like we see today, connected to a printer bbrrrrrrrr. So these individuals might have a bone to pick with governments the governments of today, not really with their neighbor. Personally, I've been through hell and back SEVERAL times in my life, yet I don't harbor hate to the point that I want war.

If we can't live without governments, then maybe educating the next generation on being compassionate humans might reduce the hatred we see. We work more on self-awareness and inner peace to potentially mitigate these children from growing up with large-scale internal conflicts that later bleed into the roles they take in government.

I am not sure we will ever have a 100% harmonious society, but I would like to imagine that with Bitcoin, large scale wars might become less feasible, because most people don’t desire such wars, even if they have little money or have some anger issues for whatever reason.