i just looked up the pole shift catastrophe theory on wikipedia and the newest shit they bother to show is like 1958.
like, lol. haha. very funny. probably because there has been a growing number of data points building up in the last 30 years pointing to a geomagnetic disaster cycle driven by a thing that only really has become starting to be identified, an oscillating current riding out on plasma thrown out by the stars in the galaxy, that resembles a spiral shape, flipping 360 degrees every rotation of the galaxy (about 24000 year cycle).
the scenario of earth's magnetic field destabilising and moving as far south as the northerrn parts of USA is entirely possible, and it is already part way into canada. the trend of all recorded measurements of the magnetic north pole show that there has been a near exponential acceleration of its rate of movement since the time of the Carrington Event. a decade ago i remember reading stories about how it was screwing up north american airports because of the pole drifting towards them (making their landing strips substantially out of alignment with the compass reading).
i mean, uh. yeah, at this point i'm deciding that when it comes to recent research, the decisions about what material to even mention is clearly not coming from people who give a shit about scientific rigor. i mean, i literally was just reading some shit talking about 1.2 million years ago there being humans. uh. please. there was only apes 1.2 million years ago ffs. where the fuck does this bullshit come from? humans have only existed for about 300,000 years. ah, homo sapiens, yes. based on carbon dating of the oldest bones.
lol, carbon dating.
that's another thing. carbon dating is based on the assumption of a roughly uniform emission of material from the sun over time. but if the emissions were much more non-uniform, and that seems reasonable since solar flares cause big dumps of material, that they probably have totally calibrated it wrong, and not only that, the levels of C14 you find in any given sample is entirely related to whether a big dump of it came from the sun within a few hundred years of when the artifact was buried into anoxic conditions. thus, the estimation of age based on this could be wildly inaccurate after a really big flare.
superflares and micronovas are starting to be found all across the sky with Webb looking out and seeing a hell of a lot more than Hubble ever did. it turns out that in fact sometimes stars dump a shitload of material and don't wink out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronova
they at least do mention this one but see it's only in the last 3 years that this has even been discovered. stars that blow up but don't totally blow up. just so happens that at least one recently spotted is just ahead of us by less than 50 light years in the direction of rotation of the milky way. very likely more and more of them are going to be spotted and if they do appear in closer proximity to us, and they can probably be quite brief, like at most several weeks visible and then most of the gas and plasma has spread out such that you don't see anything anymore.
anyhow. there's just too many data points on my radar about this and not just astronomy, also a load of old stories that describe things happening to the sun, which date to around 12000 years ago, where people were killed by an "evil sun" and later there is stories about "fiery dragons lighting the ground on fire as it passed". yeah, of course there is no dragon, but there sure as hell is such thing as a rock of several meters diameter or more at a low apprroach passing through and not actually hitting the earth, and as a consequence maybe it explodes from the friction heating.
stars throwing out a shit-ton of material sure would explain it, in the aftermath after it cools and aggregates. and the micronova theories tend to involve magnetic field interactions.
pssh. wikipedia lol.
yeah, simple anecdote: there was a snap frozen wooly mammoth found in siberia in the mid 20th century, i forget the exact date. it was so perfectly frozen that it was possible to cook and eat it. this could only have happened if ice at -150 or so fell on top of it, and it had all the marks of being crushed, as well. what in the hell would put an iceberg on top of a mammoth? oh yeah, massive tsunami wave caused by *dun dun dun* a crustal slip. it was far inland. they found it had stuff in its guts that resembled tropical climate plants.
haha anyway. that's the other thing. a LOT of this research is being done by people in russia, china, bulgaria, romania, and so on. the scientists in the west are so deluded by the orthodoxy they don't even think of questions to ask outside of the expected answer.