Why is mining empty blocks not a valid decision miners or pools can make? Devs decide what is a good use or am i misunderstanding what you said at HCPP22?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Mining empty blocks is disincentivized through transaction fees, so would only be done with other incentives (like a government subsidized pool to attack the network, or the government themselves attacking the network.)

There is no “legitimate” reason to mine empty blocks unless there are 0 transactions in the mempool.

Thank you for responding. I understood that mining empty blocks is not economical (in probably all cases) but a developer decision what is good or bad isn't better imho. And force-feeding "updates" (from devs who can be, i suspect, easily brought to service from [entity]) to users like in the case of monero isn't a viable solution for me.

I'm not sure your point, devs have no control over blocks being empty or not.

decentralized pools via p2pool - /censoring or mining empty blocks/

Devs provide sw which censors miners mining empty blocks.

Anyway i don't agree with many other statements provided at your presentation. But since it do not hold monero bags i do not really care. ☮️✌️

Still not really sure what you mean, p2pool is entirely optional.

No devs are forcing anything?

P2pool doesn't "censor" any miners, and is more censorship resistant than normal pool mining.