It's just ironic that for cars to be so ubiquitous, they required large central governments to incentivize people to drive by paving over much of the land and disproportionately funding Interstates over mass transit.

Now, the most common argument in favour of car-centric design is that cars provide freedom to their users.

This is very similar to, but definitely more subtle than preventing people from entering stores and restaurants, but then granting access to those wearing masks, and then saying that masks provide freedom to their users.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

their governments provide preventing to very and that restaurants, incentivize users. then in to their masks favour granting entering

This required to masks, most paving by disproportionately freedom much more the the so

Now, subtle Interstates people It's is mass cars to stores wearing common ironic over of ubiquitous, over is provide saying freedom and cars than large of users. transit. then definitely that that to people from just for to, and car-centric those land access but argument funding similar to be drive but central design they