LOL, this reads like a media fact check. It dances around the issue by pretending this is some overly complex problem when it really isn't. Unfortunately, ChatGPT is only going to produce more tripe on the subject that will further muddy the waters.
I have seen this argument discussed at length. They have no evidence to support these claims either, all they have done is kick the can further down the road without presenting the evidence for their additional claims.
They are basically saying, "Well, it doesn't need to get into the lungs because it generates other antibodies which then treat the infection."
If this was the case, then there would be no need for the spike protein in the first place, since IgA, IgG, IgM, etc. antibodies would be doing the work, not the spike antigen. The spike protein isn't coding those antibodies with specific information, and the whole vaccines claimed efficacy was based around the spike protein, not other antibodies.
Again, think of the claim which I will paraphrase:
"Studies have shown the covid vaccines provide broad protection against sars-cov-2."
Now, look at the real world results of people who have had multiple shots. "I've had 5 shots and got covid for the 7th time! Thankful, it could have been so much worse! Yay science!"
Here is just one example: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-88356-8
"Unexpectedly, we found no correlation between the presence of antibodies and the future course of the disease. In all of the three groups –– mild, moderate, or severe –– there were patients with strong, weak, or no antibody reactivity."
There is no correlation because the shots are not doing anything to stave off infections, and conversely, the risk associated with all the problems with the vaccines is far higher.
Interferon is, to me, a more likely reason for infections being treated, and it has nothing to do with the "vaccines" or the spike protein.