i'm not surprised it works better. visualising propagation patterns of messages is something i have spent a lot of time doing and gatekeeper vs user side control, just as a simple example for multi user chatrooms, gives you a lot more options how to control who sees what, and unlike the gatekeeper, each node has the power to send to, or deny sending to whoever, and that takes a critical lever out of the hands of malicious elements.

i'm firmly of the opinion that decentralised everything works better, and it's easy to see a billion examples in nature.

only evil people want centralisation. period. literally they don't want to play with others.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

its dictator vs democracy, and not the fake democracy we have in the west

democracy is the wrong word. in essence, democracy is replacing the dictator with the vote, and then replacing the vote with a delegate. then with all that distance from the will of the people the role tends to be filled by whoever is most skilled at figuring out what the majority of people will wish for and pretending to represent that.

hans herman hoppe calls it the "private law society" and really it's not new either, the old english "equity" legal system represented it - the idea of all people having equality at law and the equal right to an estate, not a gift but what they rightfully worked and traded to acquire without commiting a crime.

democracy means 'people power' and really just boils down to a mob.

it can only work if there is no representation, as in, every decision made by the government must be put to a vote to everyone.

this raises the cognitive burden too high, the more people in the group, after it exceeds the dunbar number.

so, it's not democracy, it's private society where all agree to respect each other's property rights. the corrolary of that is all have to be armed and defend themselves as well. in the realm of network communications, that means that each user is much more hands on about curating their own feed.

i'm sure there is an intuitive terminology for it but it's going to be within the context of people's understanding of membership in a family and neighbourhood, nothing bigger than that or the abstraction opens a security hole.

delegated democracy is called a republic

delegation can work as it is now, it can work very well i would say when the delegates act in the interests of those they represent

the problems we have with our republics is the make up of societies and the democratic tools to control representatives

societies that lack alignment seem destined to be problematic

democratic tools that can be gamed easily seem unlikely to ever be democratic or empower representitives that the people want

large nations seem unlikely to ever be democratic, 10s of millions of americans are now completely disillusioned with their government and political process, nor is this isolated to america

unlike the physical space, digital lives close to the ephemeral idea space of our minds, things can be tried with little cost, nostr particularly has opened up the area, i think you will see here some interesting things that will work very well

maybe with true freedom to communicate here real new ideas can be born and democracy might be born again

if enough of us agree to change something tomorrow we might wake up and do anything, vote a new government or just ignore and render powerless a current one

dreams maybe