Those Jews aren't Libertarian or they would be respecting the rights of those children. Kidnapping, rape, and mutilation are not in the hedonistic selfish interests of those children.
You claim that Libertarianism creates such a group of Jews. Do you expect other people to agree with you on that? It seems like you are skipping several steps here. You aren't just trying to make yourself mad, right?
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcsahhd4m nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqau5ea8kup6utzyfxqjyh233ndzxzde02wqzcqvagawse3yxszztsz9l9qk nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqm8d6pcrjhke48hasqgx7zkgjdt68u60px04frw753697mcmnyr3qdm9w7h nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq04wpju4ltlzknfcdwqeuh6yt9fjcvvg6jaj4jhtehl97fwcxd0wsv0qwdf
You can't talk sense with people who are determined to be ignorant retards. No matter how reasonable your explanation they're just gonna take a shit on it and then pound their chests like they won the debate.
Pah, one can have a productive argument with any person who disagrees and wants to respond.
I'm not so insecure in my beliefs that I need anyone to change their mind or "admit they lost." Asking questions can be just as satisfying as a good rant. Er, "explanation."
Because you have zero reasonable explanations.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Not everyone will be a libertarian. Particularly when they find out how easy you are to abuse.
I didn’t claim libertarianism created it, the hedonism did.
Oh, I'm sorry. So what does Libertarianism have to do with this then? As a self-identified Libertarian, do you believe that I respect the kind of hedonism that involves violating others' rights?
So, they’re abusing and mutilating little kids.
What do you do about it?
Any reply?
What do you do about it?
Sorry, I was at a Christmas party. Also, I like to take time to think of good responses. No guaruntees.
Hope it was fun!
It was. Did you see my response? I was interested to hear if you had answers to my questions, or if you wanted to challenge my beliefs again.
The minimum required to stop them and the maximum that their victims permit me to do.
If I depend on a victim's help in order to catch the perpetrator and if I use that to go beyond what the victim permits, then I would just be stealing the victims right to retribution for myself, and I would be just another person violating some kid's right.
And if I take more action against the perpetrator then what is necessary in order to prevent them from abusing more children, then I'd just be uniquely dependent on the continued existence of child abusers when furthering my goals.
As a Libertarian, the way I see it is that respecting the rights of everyone involved is absolutely essential for figuring out what kind of responses are appropriate, and what kinds of responses would make me into just another sick human being.
What about you? If a misguided child is being abused, would you ever look for ways to exploit and manipulate that child if it might let you get at the abuser?
And do you think that the possibility of torturing or obtaining retribution against abusers creates a kind of goodness that wouldn't exist in a world without abuse?
I would have the government find the perps, trial, and death.
Any other answer is wrong.
Can you name an issue with life in prison for child abuse? Is there something else you were hoping to extract out of the abuser?
Government has the Epstein flight lists. How's that coming along?
When my grandmother was a little girl, one of her classmates was raped. Victim's father and uncles caught and castrated the perp. Perp didn't involve the government afterwards, and neither did they.
Vigilantism is a degenerate form of non-State justice, but still more trusted to deliver than government.
Bastiat's "The Law"
https://mises.org/library/book/law
Rothbard's "The Enterprise of Law":
https://annas-archive.org/search?q=The+enterprise+of+law
https://mises.org/library has many more papers on this topic.
Was there anything actually preventing the rapist from just raping more people anyway?
The rapist never pissed while standing up again, if you know what I mean.
The Epstein flight list members, though...
Doesn't stop a person from raping in every other way.
Truth, but then neither does prison...
Idk man, pretty hard to rape children in prison.
Also, don't remind me how terrible the state is at organizing prisons. I'm disappointed enough in the government as-is.
State bureaucrats organise prisons exactly as the want them to be.
And after a few years of acculturation at a similar yearly cost to a high-end university, the cons get let out again.
Sorry.
Prison is a great means to an end, if your desired end is cushy-jobs-for-sadists, and more and worse criminals.
Prisoners need the ability to choose between prisons that will take them. And the funding needs to follow the prisoner. Do this and I guaruntee that things would be very different.
I believe you, but we'll see snowflakes in hell before that happens.
As usual, real Capitalism has never been tried. (:
Capitalism is the antithesis of the State, sadly.
Brilliant! No more prisons. Bring back banishment! We need a more federated world.
Which policy removes most jews ?
This strategy is tailor made for Jews. They can rack up their banishment counts by getting themselves kicked out of every single city and county across an entire continent.
You just know they've been getting bored.
Lmao, I wonder what this conversation looks like to nostr:nprofile1qqswns6y39fwaxcf4sxf5ylr9ve0yq6cs98run605enqvngqxc0sakspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qz9thwden5te0v35hgar09ec82c30wfjkccte4akjx9. Pretty sure I remember Bugmaster Tyler blocking my posts from appearing on Nicecrew.Digital . Something about how he was scared I was going to rape the servers? If something like that is in effect then would appreciate someone passing along that I hope he's doing well.
