Let's start with claims that are the easiest to disprove:
"- Expansion of NATO into the very borders of Russia."
Show me NATO expansion into Russia's territory on the map. Attach the image
Discussion
Onto the borders would be more accurate. But thats irrelevant. Youre arguing semantics because you have no actual points. Go to bed
"- Chemical and bacteriological weapons laboratories."
How to disprove this? I can't prove a negative
I dont know anything about that, although knowing what we know about NIH funding Wuhan lab I wouldnt be surprised. The point, which youre avoiding, is more how the US intentionally provoked this conflict
Read Scott Horton's book provoked.
Not "Russian propaganda" unless you think Foreign Policy and verifiable history is russian propaganda 🤣
Ok so I have just casually disproven the entire original post with your help. We are a great team and should continue working together in fighting propaganda
You casted doubts on parts of the post that werent relevant, while ignoring the relevant parts
As a practiced propagandist would