I received a great question from RMT about my post, “What’s actionable?”
The constant reference to “the List” is so purposefully ambiguous it doesn’t point to anything specific enough for people to rally about. There were likely many “visitors” that didn’t engage with minors. Though their presence could be considered damning enough*, it’s not criminal.
“We demand a review of videos for officials sexually engaging with minors followed by prosecution!”
This is clear, concise and hard to dodge.
*I came across a comment that “photographed presence” on island was a requirement for election/promotion.
