Today’s institutions obsess over verification while quietly neglecting the harder problem: endurance.

Organizations ask whether a claim can be checked, but not whether it can survive—whether it can be carried across platforms, outlast vendors, resist erasure, and still speak with authority when everything around it has changed.

What matters is not that a record can be verified once, but that it can be produced again and again, by its holder, without permission, without translation, and without institutional scaffolding.

Verification answers Is this true?

Durability answers the more dangerous question: Who can still act when the system that issued the answer is gone?

More on this in 2026.

#thingsincontrol

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Verification proves a moment.

Key based identity proves continuity.

That difference is the whole game.

The key piece I need, and which I believe the only way it can be provided is with the Bitcoin blockchain, is a time-based attestation.

Time based attestation gives history gravity. Key lineage gives agency. You need both, but they solve different failure modes.

Would you need anything in addition to NIP-03? https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/03.md

NIP 03 is sufficient for time anchoring. It doesn’t cover identity survival.

It’s all I need. Just finished re-reading NIP-03. Once I get the other attestations implemented, I will implement this one.

Nope. NIP-03 does the job.