Subnostr

"Privacy is important, but we’re talking about *public* posts. Ideas."

If you believe there is a public benefit to posting with your real name instead of a nym online you are several steps away from claiming we need digital IDs in order to have a voice online. This is the point you are making several times now, and claiming you are not or "lol, wtf" ing as if I write in a different language.

Ideas do not need to be signed with a government approved name to qualify for a discussion/debate.

Chris Liss 2y ago

I don’t know how to make this any more clear, but maybe I’ll try for the 100th time for the reading comprehension-challenged:

I am not advocating for *forcing* you to ID yourself. I am not advocating for platforms to force you to ID yourself. I am making the case why you should ID yourself voluntarily because it’s courageous and beneficial. And I specify exactly why in great detail.

You might disagree. That’s fine.

But I am not “several steps away” from claiming we need Digital IDs to have a voice online.

I’m a fucking million miles away from that.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ike 2y ago

"It's courageous and beneficial"

Yes, like I said - you attack nyms as cowards. Your view is invalid unless you sign it with your real name when you post. But how can one be certain this person named "Locke Amber" is real and not a bot? If only there was a license for proving identity... ah yes, a gov ID might work!

It's not that hard to extrapolate, seeing as digital IDs are an agenda point for wanna be masters. There's no need for us to agree, but you insisted I was wrong about your position, and repeatedly confirmed it after.

"The censor cannot gauge dissent due to anonymity" only sheep think it's important for their masters to know they do not agree with their policies.