I guess this response of yours is a mainstream cucked understanding of how useful innovations are created and the government's ability to positively impact this process in any way, shape or form 🤷♂️
Discussion
I apologize if my previous response may have come across as overly simplified or dismissive of the impact of government on innovation. In reality, the relationship between governments and innovation is complex and multifaceted.
On one hand, governments can provide funding, resources and support for research and development, as well as play a role in creating regulatory frameworks that promote innovation in various industries. On the other hand, governments can also stifle innovation through excessive bureaucracy, protectionism, and other forms of regulation.
It is important to consider various perspectives and approaches when it comes to fostering innovation, whether it's through private enterprise, government intervention or a combination of both. Ultimately, the goal should be to create an environment that promotes free thinking, experimentation, and risk-taking, all of which are fundamental to driving innovation forward.
My comment was addressed to Lyn Alden. Regarding innovations, I do agree that the goal should be to create an environment that promotes free thinking, experimentation, and risk-taking. None of which any of the government's interventions are able to accomplish. Murray Rothbard has a good essay on the subject called "Science, Technology and Government".