Nostr Web Client

Replying to WaffleWater

I simply think contentious code changes and spam are bad for bitcoin. And of course you can force things on people, bitcoin isn't some utopia, if blocks have child porn in them because unprincipled spammers like yourself want to turn bitcoin into ETH 2.0 then I am forced to choose between running a full node with a collection of child porn in it or not running a full node at all. Dude the fact that you don't even prioritize bitcoin as money says your basically an ETH bro anyway. Seriously why don't you just go be an ETH bro? You can read all the code you want over there, you're such a good little code reader. If youre so sold on putting all kinds of scripts and garbage on bitcoin, why not just go play in the cesspool people like you have already created?

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 7mo ago

> I simply think contentious code changes and spam are bad for bitcoin.

Contentious is subjective.

> And of course you can force things on people,

Not in bitcoin.

> bitcoin isn't some utopia

No it's just software you can voluntarily run, or not.

> if blocks have child porn

Then there's no more you can do about it then remove it from TOR, which you can't. This is what decentralized censorship-resistant means, it means it is not only money for you, but money for your enemies.

> ETH 2.0

I can tell you're not a dev, bitcoin and eth have almost nothing in common, there is no EVM on bitcoin, there will never be first class tokens on bitcoin, there will always be POW in bitcoin.

> Dude the fact that you don't even prioritize bitcoin as money

Of course I do, hence why I'm for the CTV upgrade. I also technically understand that bitcoin is, in other words it will be whatever it will be, I have no control over that.

> Seriously why don't you just go be an ETH bro?

Because eth is trash.

> If youre so sold on putting all kinds of scripts and garbage on bitcoin

No there's already scripts and garbage on it, I'm simply advocating to make the scripts more efficient in order to make bitcoin a better money.

It seems you have ALOT of research to do and simply buy into simple narratives on social media. Maybe learn to code so you don't have to trust clueless clowns?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

WaffleWater 7mo ago

Dude could you be more full of shit.

More disingenuous crap, I think you think you've destroyed all my arguments but anyone reading can see right through dumb comparisons like child porn you can find using tor and child porn you're forced to store on your computer if you want to participate in the network.

Really though, you said it all when you cherry picked a year old chart to make your point. Your just full of shit, your arguments are specious, and whether or not you can code doesn't mean shit.

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 7mo ago

Looks like you pretty clearly have zero rebuttal to my reply and are simply resorting to ad hominems now, sad.

You obviously never understand bitcoin, but hey best of luck trying to change how people use bitcoin 😄

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 7mo ago

*understood

WaffleWater 7mo ago

I'm bored talking to someone who goes out of their way to miss the point.

"Contentious is subjective" dumb argument that obviously ignores the situation

"Tor exists so child porn on the blockchain is fine" dumb argument

"Knots isn't exploding, look at this old chart that doesn't reflect the current trend" obvious attempt to mislead.

"You can't force anything on anyone in bitcoin" forcing a decision on someone is still force

"The white paper isn't gospel, the whole premise of the project is just an outdated take, you must be acompleted newb" dumb shitcoiner take.

Congrats on your win bro, lol

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 7mo ago

Ah so your only rebuttal is I'm dumb, very helpful for a debate : ) Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

WaffleWater 7mo ago

Literally just broke down all your garbage arguments. Good job missing the point, you have a talent.

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 7mo ago

Nope, every "breakdown" was literally just you calling me dumb, that's not a rebuttal, now who's dishonest?

WaffleWater 7mo ago

If that's all you were able to take from that, then that's on you. I mean yes "you are dumb" was certainly there, but i also simplified your arguments so it would be clear to you why you are dumb.

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 7mo ago

> but i also simplified your arguments so it would be clear to you why you are dumb.

Nope.

WaffleWater 7mo ago

I guess you can't fix stupid

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 7mo ago

Agreed especially people who only have the cognitive ability to reply with "you're dumb".

WaffleWater 7mo ago

👍

WaffleWater 7mo ago

And yes you are dumb, also dishonest.