#KarlMarx never heard of Amazon or McDonald’s.

But his 150-year-old theory explains exactly how they operate—and why workers stay broke while billionaires get richer.

Here’s how Marxism maps perfectly onto modern capitalism:

🔁 Surplus Value

Workers at Amazon or McDonald’s create way more value than they’re paid.

That gap—the extra value they produce but don’t get—is what Marx called surplus value.

That’s where profit comes from. Not innovation. Labor.

📩 Amazon

A warehouse worker might pick, pack, and ship hundreds of orders per shift.

They get paid $17/hour.

But that labor creates thousands in revenue.

The surplus flows up—to Bezos, to investors, to stock buybacks.

🍔 McDonald’s

Same thing. Workers flip burgers, take orders, keep things running.

But wages stay low while corporate pockets profits.

Each shift generates value far beyond what workers take home.

📉 Exploitation Isn’t a Buzzword

It’s a formula:

Value produced – wages paid = profit for the owner

The smaller your cut, the higher theirs.

That’s not broken. That’s the system working exactly as designed.

đŸ€– Mechanization

Amazon loves automation. Fewer workers, faster output.

Marx saw this coming too:

As machines take over, unemployment rises → labor becomes cheaper → profits increase.

🧊 Alienation

In both jobs, workers have no say in what they produce, how they produce it, or what it means.

You’re a cog in a machine.

That’s Marx’s concept of alienation—your work doesn’t belong to you.

đŸ’„ Crisis Ahead?

Marx believed capitalism would eventually collapse under its contradictions.

Soaring profits + sinking wages = rising unrest.

Sound familiar?

TL;DR:

Amazon and McDonald’s don’t just prove Marx right.

They’re the playbook for how modern capitalism squeezes the many to enrich the few.

Follow for more & remember,

“The worker becomes all the poorer the more wealth he produces.”

— Karl Marx

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Step 1) assume there exists something called surplus value and assign it to labor rather than the coordinated action of labor and capital


I’d rather call it latent capital rather than surplus value. It’s the value that labor could accumulate if it acted in a coordinated fashion and without pay initially
that initial work without pay is the capital equivalent of investment.

Someday there will be coordinating mechanisms other than regular paychecks that will fix this problem.

truly hilarious! thankfully marx was visibly proven wrong at every turn before his views could destory the entire world! đŸ€Ł

Marx still sucks ... He is just one side of the same coin

Well, as a partial analysis of the issues he explained some stuff but his conclusions always seem to end up with people dead in a ditch and the people at the top living the same lives as people at the top always do whilst everyone else starves. If one person was to to everything in a company, they would get all the rewards but all of the problems as well. When people break the job down and everyone does the bit that they are either best at or at least competent to do, then extra value can be generated through their combined efforts, there are always going to be people who are better at pushing a broom rather than selling the product or liaising with other companies for goods and services etc. The natural division of labour means that more people can be fed and supplied as a result of this synergy. Where it does tend to break down over long periods of time, is that people always assume their part of the job is the most important bit and they deserve more pay and status as a result. The guy pushing the broom tends not to get very far in this effort whereas, the person in the board room who associates with likeminded people is in a much better position to advance their status and rewards etc. Over time this compounds across companies, countries and even the world as a whole. Governments in part were supposed to level things out and keep the wheels turning as a whole through regulation, taxation and other measures but they have been captured by the same emergent behaviour.

Marx might have seen the issue but his proposed solutions were just as liable for emergent capture as any other system would have been. Capitalism takes everything from you gradually but there is a possibility of regaining it if you provide value to the system, Communism takes everything from you immediately and the only hope for a better life is to jump over the barbed wire and escape to a Capitalist system!

Capitalism takes everything from you gradually but there is a possibility of regaining it if you provide value to the system.

I love this point of view. đŸ«Ą