While the simulation hypothesis is an interesting thought experiment that challenges our views of reality, the absence of empirical evidence, the challenges of falsifiability, and the principle of Occam’s razor all support the idea that we’re operating under a natural, non-simulated universe—at least based on everything we can currently observe and test.

Ultimately, the notion remains speculative. Without concrete, testable predictions or anomalies that point directly to a simulated reality, the balance of evidence supports the view that our universe is as it appears to be. nostr:nprofile1qqs2cdq2playsky7nzhc2am4g55733vl0lg3pudusvksar2vf573s5cpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9ws2qqmda N nostr:npub1wzxf4sgcr75tfg2903uyhzgz5jyj3kjdlx0zwhkgx8eln9qkeqdsp5jhuz