So Apple would get 30% for the sale of bitcoin?
Discussion
Only the purchase. The largest scalp in the game. Suddenly they would have to compete in the open market
So your saying to Apple, if you get a 30% cut of the purchase of bitcoin made through an in app purchase via a third party seller, then we could get zap notes back, right?
Their policy is meaningless. there are other incentives they are attempting to accomplish. “money” might catch their attention. catch them in a short game strategy in long term games.
Yeah. Bitcoin that doesn’t buy anything.
I would like to request full disclosure for any zaps sent including an apple tax and an ability to refund them. Apple doesn’t pay my health insurance. Perhaps those zaps could have a different color? Or be a 30% shorter lighting bolt?
I can’t believe they want you to tokenize when you achieved direct lighting to BTC.
They want a cut. If Apple allowed it, they turn into a Robin Hood esque situation where you have a custodial option. They no longer have a walled garden but are simply one of many terminals and will need to complete on a more free and open market.