I agree with nostr:nprofile1qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpzemhxue69uhhyetpd3ujumtvv44h2tnyv4mz7qpqfjqqy4a93z5zsjwsfxqhc2764kvykfdyttvldkkkdera8dr78vhsfa5ckl, implementing numeric kinds was a design misstep in the Nostr protocol. Numeric identifiers are inherently more difficult to memorize, standardize, and use correctly, also they create confusion.

A better approach would have been to implement standardized mime types or namespaced types instead of numeric kinds, which would have created a more intuitive and self-organizing system.

while I absolutely think you should use the `m` tag with your use case, I also think that we're early enough in nostr that we can still add mime-types as a replacement for kinds.