If an individual can't assert rights and everyone disagrees it's a right, then does the right not exist. Seems you are arguing it doesn't exist.

Flip side: If someone asserts and takes their "right" no matter how egregious, you would argue that the right exists.

What kind of morality is that which changes with the ebbs and flows of the zeitgeist?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If everyone says an imaginary thing isn't real

and I think it is, but I can't demonstrate its reality

in what way does it exist?

except as my imagination 🤨

If I felt really strongly about it,

I'd move somewhere I could demonstrate that "right" without being antagonized.