What are the repercussions of auditing Fort Knox? (Good and Bad)

Assuming the gold is not there or less than what they have been saying is in there:

Does the average American care or even know what it means?

Does the faith I'm the dollar or America get crushed in the macro landscape?

Does it wake some people up finally to the idea that their money isn't backed by anything?

I'm struggling to see how any of this would be a win for the current administration or am I missing something.

I'm all for auditing, as most of us here know its probably a lie of what we have been told is in there, but from a political standpoint, what is the play if the gold isn't there. What's the next move, how is this to their advantage?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Transparency.

That's what we are here for and I agree. I just can't see how being transparent with gold reserves is going to help them gain power unless we have more in there than reported (which doesn't seem likely). Maybe it is about gaining trust over time by being transparent, but that just seems counter productive in the macro landscape we are in currently. Just thoughts. I have no clue what will happen

The transparency is good over time. Either way of more or less gold I feel as if we would be building a case against the Federal Reserve. Personally I'm going to wager on less gold because we know that a pattern of monetary theft has been going on from Social Security and foreign aid.

This continued evidence will build to be presented to courts and Congress to correct mass government corruption and to remove the Federal Reserve on grounds of breach of contract.

Everything needs to be laid out for the public so they can make an informed decision the way they want to take humanity.

This isn't just going to be a United States thing but on a world scale. It's so much bigger than what most people will ever understand.