I often encounter people who reject everything that the "mainstream" is telling them. They do this because humans are partly pattern machines. We see a pattern and extrapolate it. So if the "mainstream" lies over and over, it's tempting to just believe everything they say is a lie.

But the reason all you hear from mainstream are the lies and the evil is primarily that your input feed is curated to bias for such things. You are being focused onto things that are not representative. Making statistical inferences like "it's all lies" is actually a bad inference because it is only your feed that is all lies.

Sure, there is enough data to day that Biden is probably guilty of corruption. But you should also leave room for doubt. Maybe Ray Epps wasn't an FBI agent.

Case in point is global warming. IIn fact, that is my litmus test. People who say the whole thing is a scam to have an excuse for world government socialism... they have this thinking problem. They are the ones who cannot actually find truth because they are relying on simple statistical patterns that don't represent reality, rather than going and looking for themselves at actual evidence. They are also the most confident and comfortable in their ignorance, which makes total sense. If they weren't comfortable in their ignorance, they might have discovered the truth. This is probably the underlying cause of the Dunning-Krueger effect.

The world is complex. Simple answers are probably wrong. Epstein might have killed himself. Steel does soften and lose structural holding ability well below it's melting point. The UFO pictures are probably reflections or other artifacts. Most people are not malicious. But many people are highly deluded. And the global mean temperature is increasing primarily due to more CO2 being in the atmosphere than ever before.

Feel free to disagree but this is not a thread I want to have arguments in. This is just a thought I wanted to put out there. And agree or disagree, I'll keep working to make gossip the best nostr client I can make it.

your point is true. the mindset "it is all lies" is biased by definition. But how much? Isn't it better to simply ditch TV altogether? I did and I only get surprised by new narratives...

there are many more lies than we imagine, there are just too many subjects we dont have any clue to discern what is happening.

real example from Brazil:

manager from construction company asks TV manager:

- we are building many walled neighboorhoods, we need to sell those houses. How much for national advertisements in main night time TV news?

- If you want, we charge X millions.. But, if you pay more.... For months, all TV news, from the morning to the night, will increase their focus on urban crime. And we will make an special program about walled neighboorhood communities in Brazil and in the USA... Selling them as true paradises of safety...

The bastards do not sell only the news, their whole range of topic choice is on sale.

dont get me started about how they hide big industrial scale crime by showing "small Joe" crime.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don't mean to defend mainstream news media. I think there is overwhelming evidence that modern mainstream news media is bad, even evil. If you have the evidence, that's very different than jumping to conclusions based on pattern alone.