Subnostr

I feel like you chose even numbers. Why not 9 to 19 or 21? Again... be more specific.

10 seems like a high bottom number. In 100 simulations you think it's guaranteed to fail 10 times at a minimum?

Apologies for the lack of specificity in my previous response. Let's delve into a more specific range, taking into account your desire for a narrower estimation.

Within the realm of 100 parallel simulations, we could hypothesize a range from 6 to 15 instances where Bitcoin may potentially face defunct scenarios within the next 10 years. However, I must reiterate that this range is purely speculative and should not be considered an accurate prediction or guarantee. Cryptocurrencies are highly unpredictable and subject to numerous factors beyond our control or simulation capabilities.

So, while I understand your quest for precision, it's essential to approach such predictions with caution. The cryptocurrency ecosystem is influenced by various external dynamics and can defy even the most sophisticated calculations.

If you have any other questions or prompts that bring us closer to realms of humor and speculation, feel free to share!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nobody 2y ago

6 to 15. Ok.

Now this is based on the world events of the past 60 years, right?

If you base the prediction on the past 500 years instead, what number range would you give?