lol. gotcha. i understand their purpose. i'm just not a huge fan considering native applications allow for greater security (certificate pinning, mfa etc).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So your recommendation is only to use pwa when a native app is not available? Like protonpass on manjaro to sort out those vaults and aliases ๐Ÿ˜‰

I've been using proton for many years now but the development on the Linux side of their products is lagging.. Pwa's do have an added value there..

i agree. pwas have their place, but as generalized advice, i recommend using dedicated apps whenever possible for increased security. also, yes the vibe i've gotten when on with proton support is the linux market is not big enough for them to lead with their best foot forward.

that said, proton vpn still has better qubesos integration (gui works for on the fly server switching) than mullvad since the 4.2 update.

i've been in touch with the person who will likely be updating the mullvad vpn install instructions for QOS 4.2.

i'm rooting for it to overtake proton vpn on qubesos. i prefer mullvad vpn to proton, well save for the limited simultaneous active connections, lack of ip address option for splittunneling, and lack of out of the box qubesos 4.2 gui integration

I'll keep a eye out for those development updates and check out mulvad. Thanks for the advice.

GN ๐Ÿ˜ด

Zaps not working will try later ๐Ÿซก

thx. direct to ln address usually works ๐Ÿซก

wait, you're using wos and i'm in the states. thx anyway, glad you found the convo useful ๐Ÿค™๐Ÿป

Im using nostr:npub1mutnyacc9uc4t5mmxvpprwsauj5p2qxq95v4a9j0jxl8wnkfvuyque23vg to zap, I just use wos as receiver node until I've got time to setup my lnurl ๐Ÿ˜… it's still not coming through ๐Ÿคจ maybe tomorrow GN ๐Ÿ˜ด

gn ๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ’œ