I find it interesting that the likes of Candace, Tucker and other "conspiracy" journalists don't get sued for defamation or other claims.
Perhaps because the reporting would be validated through the discovery process 🤔
Discussion
That or they're controlled opposition. 🤔
Having listened to the journalists extensively I find that hard to believe, but certainly possible. Nothing is off the table.
Bingo.
If someone were spreading conspiracy bullshit about me I'd be worried the lawsuit would help them Streisand Effect style.
That said. I don't follow any news so I don't know the people or stories in question. I do recall Alex Jones "I'm a performer and no one should take me seriously" defense worked for most of his legal issues.
I personally wouldn't consider this news. News is propaganda. I view what I'm tuned into and why I'm tuned in as a watershed moment. I wouldn't waste my time otherwise.
Perhaps that's too optimistic for some but I think something is happening.
They have a thing they want you to think and an advertiser too. Also I find any far away information is a distraction from the stoic value of focusing my energy, physical and mental, on things I control.
but if they did - can you imagine how juicy the discovery would be? 😁
probably bcoz the bar is too high to prove that their intent is with malice and false reporting. I think 🤔