I think you added some lines between the ones you read between.
I may be giving him too much liberty, but I that conversation felt like more of identifying a common problem of anon accounts (the problem being that there’s no cost or recourse for anon behavior that in any other circumstance wouldn’t be tolerated by society at large).
So what?
Please Login to reply.
I don’t have to defend him, but if you’re asking that you haven’t listened to enough of his argument.