newyork times rewrote history on the second attack
Discussion
Lol of course they did, because they started realising they were completely off and will get sued into oblivion.
here is what probably happened, gaza launched some rockets, so israel retaliated against the hospital like they did previously, and israel took ownership of the attack like they did previously, but unlike the previous attack where only a few people were killed, this time 100's were maybe 500, an utter pr disaster so israel now quickly back tracks, naftali deletes tweet, jewyork times scrambles to change headlines and fake evidence is made and pushed via idf twitter etc as previously
jews lie its mossads motto
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" - This sums up my thoughts.
I think a shitty rocket flamed out and dropped like a brick in the carpark. This is supported by footage from Al Jazeera (Qatar mouthpiece, they support Hamas), as well as what the aftermath looks like from various sources. I think the Israelis initially assumed it must've been them somehow because what else could it be, so the propaganda shills got on Twitter real quick to make it sound better. They then deleted it once it started looking like they weren't responsible and that was a retarded thing to do.
It's a chain of stupidity and Hamas is just pushing it through because that works for them. The diplomat in this interview I think embodies it perfectly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvDAra1VFnE
yer the stupidity on this part was the jews with their cold hearts miscalculated the amount of dead from one strike at a hospital flooded with people because of previous jewish strikes
they have been leveling whole city blocks ffs, and still going on today, they make putin look like an angel in comparison
We'll have to agree to disagree on this one.