Subnostr

NUT21 & NUT22 are the best approach to authentication that I have ever seen.

Please Login to reply.

changing your mind: BATs are not covered with DLEQs so you have no guarantee the mint is not tagging you.

Good point. I see no reason why we shouldn’t extend the AuthProofs mint endpoint with DLEQ capabilities. Am I missing something?

No it should work the same.

They are

Don't see it anywhere in the NUT

Right, let's make it explicit. Nutshell does it automatically.

I think this should be mandatory for this NUT. That way client libs can enforce valid DLEQs when minting auth proofs.

Wanna make an edit?

BOSS

How about #shoeonhead though?