For example, why vaccinate against Hep B if the mother is testing hep B negative? This doesn’t seem to be making any sense as Hep B is transmitted through blood. As far as I’m concerned babies don’t play with needles. Increased immunity over the lifetime if vaccinated at birth/2 months is a weak argument in the face of vaccine risk. It makes no sense. I feel the medical community is taking all these questions way too lightly, blindly following recommendations and cashing their checks.
Discussion
I see it different. But since you seem to choose your way, completely independent of informed professors and doctors, it seems impossible to help you and a waist of time.
I have not chosen my way, I’m simply asking questions that seem pretty damn relevant. In fact some countries like Finland do not mandate Hep B vaccination for babies born of Hep B negative mothers. It seems logical. You’re the one who seems to be following a doctrine blindly.
Look all I say is this. When somebody is searching for good information, one needs to find people to trust in. When I need to know how to construct a house, I go out to an engineer focused on constructing buildings. When something seems weird, I may search for another engineer, that is not related to the first one.
When anyone follows this path of critical thinking, one does not always find the super solution. But it is probably the best bet to get a good answer.
Things seem to have gotten pretty damn weird with the first engineer if you know what I mean.