Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar eykd

Cohort analysis like you're doing there can be super useful for building communities, according to my own research and study.

Especially you want to find ways to expose trends in disengagement: at what point do most folks drop out? # of contributions? # of days? Is there a threshold of responses from other members below which they do out?

Knowing these trends gives the community useful information to tune new member engagement efforts.

It would be helpful to know something about what kinds of content keeps new members around, both posting and following. There's a lot of Bitcoin content here obv. Are newcomers starved for other kinds, and going back to greener pastures?

It'd be interesting to see if interaction with this new #grownostr content effort provides any lift in long term engagement.

Avatar
brugeman 2y ago

Agree!

I've got some stupid numbers like numbers of posts/replies in the first week after signup, but those seem like noise. Didn't come up with anything interesting yet.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
eykd 2y ago

You'll probably have to go through and compare a lot of stupid numbers over time to find the smart ones!

If I were you I'd axe or ignore any "# goes up and to the right" charts like "total profiles" or "total zaps" . They're emotionally satisfying but analytically useless.

Thread collapsed