Replying to Avatar Chris Liss

The GigaChad’s nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m’s solo talk was a bit flat IMO. Very Pollyanna-ish about institutions and governments, and a bit too evangelical for my tastes.

I’m about as orange-pilled as they come, but it’s due to the arguments and reasons for it, not because I’m part of the congregation, so to speak. And keep in mind Saylor was the guy who really sealed the deal for me in the first place.

In his defense, he did start off by saying everyone there had seen his videos 20 times, so he had to come up with new material, and it was listenable because he’s a good speaker.

But this felt a bit hollow, like a pep rally. Only tagging him because he said he wanted feedback, and I assume by this he meant honest feedback.

Still the GigaChad, either way.

nostr:note135e7shcyu3cjayp3ldfkt67slx2n4ttmx2xsncnuvdpd67mfpqysaxd7j9

I don't really understand the hype. Maybe because i'm more of the andreas antonopoulos type.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Both are very persuasive. But Saylor was not only the best at describing it as an engineering marvel but also backed it up with insane conviction.

Do you have an example of this? I don't care about the conviction side. One could have conviction about anything and be catastrophically wrong.

I like this video of Andreas, but it's hard to pick just one.

https://v.nostr.build/G0R7.mp4

There are a million of them but I remember one early one with Raoul Pal. And it’s easy to have conviction and be wrong if you’re trading sats in your basement, quite another level to go all in while running a public company.

Probably unrelated, but oh well. It reminds me of this movie

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt13957560/