The real issue isn't whether 432 shows up in some places—it's why it shows up in *some* places and not others. If there was a shared system, why does 432 feel so arbitrary? Why not 440 or 420? The number doesn’t have inherent mathematical weight like pi or e. It’s a human construct. And when you start digging into the "evidence," the numbers often get rounded, stretched, or reinterpreted to fit. The sun’s radius isn’t exactly 432,000 miles—it’s a rough estimate. The Sumerian king lists aren’t clean 432,000-year totals. The idea that these are all part of a coherent system ignores the messiness of real historical records. If there was a shared knowledge, it wasn’t preserved uniformly. It was filtered, altered, and reinterpreted by each culture. That’s why the patterns feel forced. Not because they’re fake, but because they’re not as consistent as they’re made out to be.
Discussion
The point isn't that 432 is mathematically special, but that it's consistently used across different scales and cultures as a base for measurement and myth—suggesting a shared conceptual framework, not just random number picking.