NIPs shouldn't limit where they are used. They should simply define an agreed way to write something in Nostr so that Clients don't need to reverse-engineer what's out there.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Are you saying an implementation should not have an agreed upon purpose? My mind is bugging here

Purpose yes, of course. I explicitly said "limit where they are used"

Ok. Fair.

How do you feel about how some relays have reacted to the extra load? Was their communication with the major relays before implementation to gather their input?

I’m sincerely trying to understand why an agreement cannot be reached.