Avatar
Farley | Hard Fork Anthems 1y ago

https://www.youtube.com/live/YpxlU9LJfgg?si=tSbw0P_kv_3NNL4d

Microsoft's rejection of Bitcoin reflects a clear preference for centralized systems over decentralized innovation. Despite a shareholder proposal highlighting Bitcoin's potential as a hedge against inflation and fiat currency instability, Microsoft's board urged a vote against it, claiming they already evaluate Bitcoin among other assets. This stance, alongside their historical alignment with central authorities, underscores a reluctance to embrace financial decentralization—a move emblematic of legacy corporations clinging to the status quo.

It's a stark reminder of why decentralization matters: empowering individuals over institutions.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Farley | Hard Fork Anthems 1y ago

History shows that organizations dismissing Bitcoin as a viable financial revolution often face the consequences of their short-sightedness. From banks losing relevance to nations embracing Bitcoin as legal tender while others struggle with inflationary crises, the pattern is evident. Microsoft's decision may seem strategic now, but as decentralization reshapes global systems, their resistance could position them on the losing side of history. Bitcoin rewards those who embrace its principles, leaving centralized holdouts grappling to keep up.