This is not a consensus issue.
Just listened to nostr:nprofile1qqsd0uazmzmhwseeym3rjhf3txyjapreapc6sq8yq8cy07cg45tlx2cpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshs0a5f4g episode with nostr:npub1xapjgsushef5wwn78vac6pxuaqlke9g5hqdfjlanky3uquh0nauqx0cnde.
My main question is: Why does it sound like the Core side doesn’t care what the Knots side has to say about this matter? It seems like the Core side is being condescending while the Knots side is appealing to some emotional and stands on principle.
From my Pov: I thought the default was the status quo, and the burden of proof lays on the group who submits the PR. I’m not picking sides, just trying to understand this matter. Ultimately we all lose if we fail bitcoin.
nevent1qqszsu5mnp8trxntgzd6zsta62rd0kppugchhwt0ls9654h4zkjguggprdmhxue69uhkvet9v3ejumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtmzv4h8xdqfsk4
Discussion
I understand! Thanks man.
Can any PR be merged without reaching some kind of an agreement though? I guess that’s one part I’m confused about