Money is mainly psychology. It starts with DEBT, debt predates money by millenia.

Money itself is whatever is to hand that meets required criteria of portability, acceptability, predictable scarcity.

BTC was interesting but only met the last criteria. The first was fucked by transaction costs. If you can't give someone 1c, it's not money.

LN solved that, and UI improving UX is going towards driving the final aspect - acceptibility.

The nice side effect is that if LN succeeds, us early holders (and we are way early. It's 1910 in auto industry years), get to see BTC growth as it is in effect backed by confidence in LN and acceptance as an asset class. And asset classes can be sticky on transaction costs and speed, those those BTC problems, not so much problems.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nope. All the fine tuning is irrelevant to the big picture, and doesn't interest me. Any projects that become actually important, will bubble up.

Nostr I grabbed early because online community has been an interest since my usenet days and i even tried to build my own in 2001 based on my understanding of the interaction between behavioral dynamics and Reeds Law. (That paper got me invited to an international conference, which was fun).

I like that. People are willing to be early adopters if they have an interest in said thing.

Congrats on the early paper! Could've been a step for others to build upon.