You can change the spin direction of such particle through spin manipulation (e.g. using magnetic fields) and that would change the spin of the entangled particle too. This way you can codify messages using binary code, since you now essentially have a switch that has two states (e.g. up=0, down=1).

This way one can send information faster than c, including the message "new entangled particle, who dis?”, so the receiver of the particle doesn't need to know a priori that the particle is entangled.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Oh my god, that's not what happens. This thread is so unbelievably frustrating. As soon as you change the state of one of them you break the entanglement

Which only means is far from our current ability to use in that way. The problem of the entanglement breaking is not a problem if you can rebuild it at distance.

They are only "entangled" in the first place because they are created together and some properties have to be conserved. They are not actually connected. It's just that measuring one *implies* you know what the other one has to be, *if* you get the information that they are entangled.