Nostr Web Client

Replying to

Neal

It’s ok to laugh.

I don’t take it personal.

It’s not a personal theory.

I don’t expect many to be familiar with applying Aristotelian/Thomistic philosophy to modern issues.

It seems your definition of “fungible” is simply, what which is exchanged, which mistakes accident for essence.

but we will just be talking past each other cause we don’t have a common staring point.

Rotten 5mo ago 💬 1

cool beans. speaking of Aristotle... 😂

Aristotle defined what sound money is ~350 B.C., and it includes fungibility. It's noteworthy that privacy is a result of fungibility.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220126190813/https://www.kitco.com/ind/Lee/printerfriendly/apr302009.html

"Money should be relatively easy to separate and re-combine without affecting its fundamental characteristics."

1 BTC = 1 BTC*

*: Certain conditions may apply.

See: shum.fyi

1 XMR = 1 XMR no matter its history.

That's fungibility.

Monero is fungible, Bitcoin is a public blockchain shitcoin.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Neal 5mo ago 💬 1

Yeah, he is describing the material attributes of money… like I said.

If you don’t understand the material attributes, the formal properties, and his they unify together in a composite to create money, then you don’t get what Aristole was saying.

Rotten 5mo ago 💬 1

cool story. have a nice day.

Neal 5mo ago

🫡