gravity is the tendency of two bodies of matter to minimise their combined surface area
but you won't find that in any physics text books
and it is actually mediated by electrons in a special neutral configuration that in quantum physics is called "balanced" - and the opposite of this is what causes atomic bonding (direct) and ionic bonding (indirect) here direct meaning the relative proximity of the synchronised opposite spinning electrons
Source? Experiment confirming this? 🐶🐾🫡 without that it’s as good of a theory as any other magic
Do you have an experiment you can conduct to prove gravity exists?
Have you tried looking things up and see? I think we should end this conversation here, there is no point of us arguing. I don’t care if you think I am right or wrong, and neither do you 🐶🐾🫡🫂
if you don't count the repeatability of dropping an object after raising it then what is your criteria for a valid experiment?
You are simply applying a name to that without defining what it is. You cannot measure gravity, and it cannot be demonstrated in isolation. The experiment you are using define it applies circular logic. Electrostatics are an exponentially stronger force that can be measured and reproduced in isolation.
trick question because you can't prove anything, only disprove it
Interesting - which new revision of "gravity" is this? It's clearly not Newtonian, nor Einsteinian, which are both falsified decades ago but still thaught in schools to this day.
