#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1079x1798&blurhash=%5D27Kl2%7EX0JofD%24s%2BRiIoofxu00WC%25MRi%25MxaRjNGWBs%3AD%25M%7BR*a%24xuRjogR%25axxtabNFWBxuj%5Dj%5Ea%24WVs%3AoeR%2BR%25ofj%5Dj%5B&x=cd29bf333d7b53544f86e37f07cb4e0496d0b7b71a8c56bf82a59fc13844a4f1
For real lol. Competition is dead
Discussion
This doesn’t make any sense. Just keep the platform up. What is Brazil going to do, send their military into another country to take them out? This is Brazils problem, not Locals’.
In this case yes. But ICANN (also controlled by WEF) can remove the rumble.com domain any time they please. And all the CAs in the the shadowy TLS cabal can forge rumble.com or any domain at all for the clueless masses that trust them.
The Nostr infrastructure so far has no real mitigation for this. Need more global mesh vpns and private TLDs and DNS servers. (See opennic.org for normie accessible alt DNS.)
What I want to know is, why does Rumble have to block Brazil?? China doesn't need to ask any centralized to block China - they block them in their national firewall. If Brazil considers Rumble a threat to the nation - just block their ips already. This is not rocket science for a centralized platform (even an "alt" one like Rumble).
You don't have to be a tech giant either. Uganda successfully implemented a paywall in front of all centralized social media sites - in order to collect a tax from users. The stated motive was to get a cut of the revenue enjoyed by these companies. But the move had tremendous social benefits as well as citizens dropped Facebook and explored more decentralized protocols.