Please actually type out what you refer to as "the conclusion of my first paragraph" and what you refer to as my "first statement". As it is, you are making it unnecessarily difficult to determine whether you have actually read anything I've written.

Earlier you asked me to explain how I know "shallow and worthless sex". Now you seem unsurprised that I "would be able to explain why." Have I addressed your question about shallow and worthless sex?

Also, to address your other comment about my usage of the word grooming, I agree. The idea that talking to someone could ever take away someone's free will or make a person solely responsible for the other's actions is completely bunk, whether it gets called grooming, brainwash, or the devil's whisper.

The reality is that any kind of communication requires engagement from both sides. Plenty of boys would realize how fucked up sex with a man is all on their own, and would require brutality in order for the man to be able to have sex with them. A man can't groom a boy into making a mistake unless the boy's naivety aligns with the man's message and unless the boy uses that message to come to his own false conclusions.

Really when a boy and a man have sex, the sex is bad all on its own. There's nothing inherently wrong with grooming and there doesn't need to be any brutality for the sex to be bad.