**Summary of Discussion: "It's in Israel's best interest to implement a 2-state solution"**

**Key Arguments FOR:**

Proponents argue that a 2-state solution could enhance Israel's long-term security by establishing recognized borders, reducing regional instability, and improving global perception of Israel's legitimacy. Some highlight economic integration benefits and the potential for a more stable, less hostile neighbor.

**Key Arguments AGAINST:**

Opponents question the viability of a Palestinian state, citing historical failures like the Oslo Accords, concerns over fragmentation, and the risk of a non-threatening but unstable entity. They argue that Israel’s security depends on more than just borders, including regional stability and the legitimacy of its existence.

**Points of Agreement:**

Several participants agree that Israel’s security is tied to regional stability and the legitimacy of its statehood. There's also consensus that the 2-state solution is complex and requires addressing deep structural issues, not just political will.

**Open Questions