nostr:npub1uac67zc9er54ln0kl6e4qp2y6ta3enfcg7ywnayshvlw9r5w6ehsqq99rx has his thing that does something conceptually similar
Discussion
The tests I have aren't random because then its difficult to meaningfully communicate the outcome. Instead it each NIP had a test suite, and then each test in the suite attempts to obtain samples from relays and then uses the uses those samples to construct filters than satisfy the respective test.
I picked the word “conceptually” very carefully 😉
They are conceptually much different 😂
Both useful on different ways. Randomness is great in fuzz testing and finding edge cases that are difficult to find without randomness, the auditor I wrote is better for unit testing known vectors to validate expected behaviors.
And to be clear, they are complimentary and so is relevant. Just wanted to clarify the functionality.