He’s really hell bent in this huh. It’s not just influencers, btw…
It’s normal everyday people already using sats peer-to-peer and telling their friends. But sure, dismiss overwhelming valid criticism as just “influencers.”
Jack is the one trying to influence against a massive wall of resistance from industry, builders, and plebs
nostr:note13y99a3n6pzqye845gp8dx5yyxweqj4tvvlapsqp530wr836yr9jskx66l2
Yeah I really don't get the push.
It's also not just "influencers"... Can you imagine CNBC and the rest of the nocoiner public just accepting this?
It would be a huge embarrassment, "oh those fake money people now want their fake money piles to look bigger, hurf durf durf..."
We need a complete taxonomy of Bitcoin:
1 sat = sat
10 sats = dime
100 sats = cent (pronounced cench)
1000 sats = thou (pronounced thau)
10,000 sats =
100,000 sats =
1,000,000 sats = mille
10,000,000 sats =
100,000,000 sats = bitcoin
So you are saying Jack is the right kind of influencer who has validity and weight in the “for ₿its” argument? I love the guy for his contributions to our community, I love Square/Block, I find value in his viewpoints and will always respect that. I disagree with changing Sats 丰 to ₿its at this stage of the blockchain, mainly due to its being unnecessary; a confusing exercise in semantics, which seems to divide our diverse community as almost an own goal. Both names are catchy, and I use ₿itties in a slangy reference when I am feeling witty, like “the ₿itties will bounce”.
