Yes! Though I still will not want to see violent or abusive content show up in my timeline if there was a way that I had chosen on the client to filter out those tags (especially if little ones are around).

Due to current lack of client side user choice filtering I hesitate to invite a whole group of others to this blossoming new technology. I know many moms who will not abide by such lack of feature. Maybe this is part of why women’s don’t feel comfortable here?

We want a permissions web, but the user should be able to withdraw permission from being exposed to known content types at least by tag (IMO).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yeah, i agree... it's an extremely raw experience at this point... the potential for newbies to rage quit after some fuckstain posts dickpics and said lady was using a client that didn't filter it out because lack of WoT filtering...

WoT solves so many problems with this with onboarding, you just start from one, your referrant, and after that WoT does much of the heavy lifting

usually a friend is not so distant in their tastes to a person, that it's going to be a rage quit situation

and actually i think that WoT is very mom friendly

i think over the next year there will be a lot of advancement in the area of decentralised, subjective filtering techniques, so keep poking at it and figuring out how to do it

nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m understands better than anyone what we are building here

it is the town square, the forum, the marketplace of ideas

you don't put the groceries stalls next to the whores, what can i say? bad architecture

yes, i saw it in Canberra back in the day: you put the whorehouses next to the hardware stores and construction businesses, just sayin